Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Non-Invasive Ventilated ALS Patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection among neuromuscular diseases with respiratory involvement, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is still to be elucidated. OBJECTIVES: We aim to characterize the clinical outcome of ALS patients non-invasive ventilated (NIV), following SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively our patients followed regularly at our ALS clinic, from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (middle March 2020) to March 2021. We included patients on NIV with a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. We recorded demographic and clinical data, including from the acute infectious illness. RESULTS: Three men with spinal-onset ALS are described, mean age of onset was 55±9.1 years (45-61), and mean disease duration was 17.5±15.9 months (6.1-41). All of them were wheelchair-bounded, with a mean ALSFRS-R of 15.3±0.6 (15-16). One patient used NIV 15 hours/day, 2 between 4 to 7 hours/day, and all used assisted coughing twice daily. None had coexistent comorbidities. They were managed for SARS-CoV-2 infection as outpatients with fluticasone, bronchodilators, azithromycin and increasing frequency of assisted coughing. Supplemental oxygen (mean of 2 liters per minute) was needed in two patients, and one required NIV also during the daytime. Total recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in all, despite being in an advanced stage of their disease, with severe respiratory involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt medical treatment is recommended for ALS patients with severe disease infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Phrenic nerve study as outcome in clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Introduction: Respiratory tests are fundamental for monitoring respiratory function in ALS, and essential in clinical trials. Slow vital capacity (SVC) was canceled in some countries to prevent COVID-19 transmission. We aimed to test phrenic nerve motor responses as an option to SVC in clinical trials. Methodology: Patients followed-up in our unit were selected respecting inclusion criteria used elsewhere: possible/probable/definite disease; onset-age 18-80years; disease duration from disease duration ≤24months; body mass index (BMI)>20kg/m2; respiratory subscore of the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R)≥11; upright SVC ≥ 70%. We added normal phrenic responses (meanPhrenAmpl, ≥0.4mV). All patients were on riluzole. SVC and meanPhrenAmpl were recorded at study entry (T0) and 24 weeks later (T1). Decays were determined. Sample size was calculated for a treatment effect of 30% on the decay rate. Results: We included 317 ALS patients (191 males, 225 spinal-onset), mean onset-age 59.9 ± 10.7 (31-80)years, mean onset BMI 25.48 ± 3.2 (20.1-35)kg/m2, mean disease duration 10.5 ± 5.6 (1-24)months, mean ALSFRS-R 41.54 ± 4.3 (22-47) and respiratory subscore 11.83 ± 0.38 (11-12). MeanPhrenAmpl and SVC were weakly but significantly correlated at T0 and T1. At T1, MeanPhrenAmpl decayed 16.94 ± 16.45% and SVC 13.5 ± 16.86%. For the proposed drug effect, 174 and 272 patients would be needed to recruit using respectively meanPhrenAmpl and SVC decline as the primary outcome measurement (accepting no dropouts). Discussion: Contrary to SVC, meanPhrenAmpl is non-volitional and not associated with aerosolization risk. Lower recruitment number (98 patients less) would be needed, translating shorter inclusion period, trial length and costs, and probable lower missed data rate. MeanPhrenAmp is an alternative test in ALS clinical trials.